- Latest Blog Post: Is the BBC hurting British politics? by Rob Knight
- Latest Comment: Joe Otten on Is the BBC hurting British politics?
Subscribe to our RSS feed here
Corporatist Conservatism
In Wednesday's Guardian Simon Jenkins posited that "Ipswich proves how badly we need Tory libertarians". He does not recognise the current Conservative Party as being able to make the case for an increase in basic civil liberties:
What is the matter with the Conservative party? It once claimed a nodding acquaintance with the cause of liberty. Now it runs with the corporatist pack. If there is anything to be banned, regulated or computerised, it howls from the dispatch box for "something to be done". Be it prostitutes, drugs, prisons, NHS computers, data protection or civil rights, the Tories are desperate not to be seen as out of the action.
Just like Blair, Cameron seems content to have his agenda shaped at the behest of focus groups and the press. As Jenkins continues:
The Tories could tell us exactly what a modern Conservative means by a free society, and list the regulations and restrictions they intend to repeal in their bonfire of controls. They could seize the moment of the Ipswich headlines by declaring their determination to end counter-productive bans on consensual crime. Merely preaching an end to government interference in the private affairs of citizens is hypocritical if, when case after case comes along, Cameron funks mentioning it for fear of the press.
Indeed. Project Cameron is not about any sort of principle, as Cicero argued so persuasively earlier this week. It is solely about securing a return to power for the Conservatives, who have finally come to the realisation that the "Natural Party of Government" finds loss of power more painful than the triumph of the viewpoint of one their disparate sects (although, of course, if power was secured these internal tensions would surface immediately).
Yet what is the point of this power, if the Conservatives will not act?
If the Tories spend every day dancing attendance on the tabloids, they will get absolutely nowhere with wavering voters. If oppositions, especially those professing an aversion to an overwhelming state, cannot see how specifically to curb it, who will?
The answer is obvious - it has to be the Liberal Democrats. A clear and urgent expression of Liberty has to be our rallying cry in the run up to the general election. We owe it to the voters to offer them this choice; they will not get it from the Blue Labour parties.
It is distinctive, but it is also right.

Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Google





Agreed.
I was going to write something on this myself.
Unfortunately the LibDems are seen as a semi-socialist tax and spend party (which I think some members would like it to be) but we have the liberal core, and there is certainly a place for more libertarians.
I always wondered why libertarians were content with the Tories, its against most of Tory history and philosophy, and even though some Tories would embrace it as a counter to socialism, they never embraced the social freedoms of libertarianism, only a few of the economic fringes.
Surely a party which boasts such people as JS Mill, Trenchard and Gordon (aka Cato) in their history would be more appealing to libertarians? (rather than a party which boasts Disraeli and drove away the Peelites).
I agree with you and Tristan, Tabman.
Indeed it is hard to see what the tories hae got to do with liberty: their raison d'etre has been the preservation of a society ruled by class, religion and convention.
Peter
http://pigeon-post.blogspot.com/
I can understand that this issue has great appeal to Lib Dem core voters,but has never got above the radar screen in terms of being a key issue for voters.
You seriously believe that this will be an issue for your average floating voter?
Fair enough, but surely corporatism is at heart of what *most* Liberal Democrats who have won elections believe in.
It was summed up very well by one of your councillors, Chris Took, on Political Betting, when he decried people who thought that tiny reductions in council tax were more important than a new visitor information centre in Canterbury.
Perhaps it is the nature of almost anyone who seeks political office to believe that they can run the voters' affairs more efficiently than the voters can.
Sean, firstly, welcome to the site and good to have your comments!
Secondly- I think what this highlights is somethign that, I think, you and I agree on - namely that we have (to paraphrase Wallace) "the wrong political parties".
Although in Chris Took's case you could argue that if the electors don't agree with his proposals they can vote him out of office.
________________________________________________
"Think big thoughts but relish small pleasures."
H. Jackson Brown, Jr.
I also think that Sean makes a good point. Still part of me thinks you can believe in small govt and think that a tourist info centre is a productive investment.
Peter
That's why you're a Lib Dem Peter! ;o)
________________________________________________
"Think big thoughts but relish small pleasures."
H. Jackson Brown, Jr.