Another Brick in the Wall

An anti-intellectual culture is the cause of Big Brother ignorance, not school failings.

"We don't need no education" sang the kids on Pink Floyd's 1979 No 1 single, thereby disproving their assertion (as any pedant will happily point out).

There has been far too much written and spoken about the Big Brother Racism incident in the last week, so I will confine myself to commenting about one particular aspect of this sorry event. Many commentators have remarked upon the main protagonists' obvious ignorance, and most have then gone on to blame this on the UK's education system.

Whilst clearly there are some very poor schools, I'm afraid this argument just doesn't wash. The simple reason why the participants were ignorant, is because they come from families and a wider culture which does not value education and knowledge. Most children spend roughly 5 hours a day, 5 days a week in school. They spend far more of their time out of school, and even the best schooling in the world will be undone when those children leave the school gates. Contrast this with countries like South Korea where education is highly prized and as a result nearly 80% of school leavers go to University.

This is the primary reason why people are prepared to move house or fork out for private education for their children - parents who put a high value on learning are (rightly) fearful of the baleful influence of this anti-learning culture on their children, and seek to remove them to oases of education where their talents can blossom.

This is not to say that all ill-informed or poorly-educated people are racists - clearly they are not. Similarly the anti-intellectual culture is endemic in Britain and is just as much the preserve of the rich and powerful as it is of the poor.

But it remains the case that the best route to a tolerant liberal society is via education, knowledge and learning. And, given the culture we operate in, that is an uphill task.


Comments

On 23 January 2007 - 10:11am, wrote:

The anti-intellectual problem is huge, even in a school with lots of very intelligent people, to be a boy reading a book was seen as odd.

One thing we could do to is let teachers impart the most important lesson they can - that learning is fun and interesting. Unfortunately too many teachers do not even know they should be doing this and even when they do they are hamstrung by the national curriculum and targets.


On 23 January 2007 - 10:17am, wrote:

I'm not sure about "most" commentators. Simon Hoggart wrote about Jade Goody's (?) difficult family background (rolling spliffs for her mum at the age of four) iirc. I would personally be very happy to see grater respect for book learning. But how can this be achieved?


On 25 January 2007 - 10:32am, wrote:

Bryan, this is a very big and complex problem.

As a Liberal, I do not believe in forcing anyone to do anything. Indeed, I would rather see the school leaving age lowered to 14, and allow children to pursue vocational careers should they so choose rather than continue with an academic education they see as irrelevant.

However - there is a big caveat to this.

We are too hung up on people cycling through the education system on the conveyor belt form one end to another (and I speak from experience, having spent a (mostly) enjoyable 20 years on it). What we have to recognise is that education is an ongoing process and people will come to realise their needs at differenet times in their life.

Someone leaves academic education at 14? Fine. But presently if they realise at 20 they made a big mistake, its very difficult for them to rectify it. We need to make the opportunities for enhancing education easier to take in some fashion. Again - this is a very easy thing to say and a very difficult thing in practice to work out.

We are also working against a cultural environment of suspision of "too much" education that is deeply rooted. It will take decades to change this. It can be done, but progress will not be overnight.
________________________________________________
"Think big thoughts but relish small pleasures."
H. Jackson Brown, Jr.