ID cards are dead

There's no way back for the ID card scheme now
| Categories:

Surely ID cards are now finished, dead, deceased - an ex-policy? There's surely no way that anyone can believe in the idea of a central database of our most important personal details, to be administered by the government, after this:

Discs containing the personal details - including, where relevant, bank account details - of all the families in the UK receiving child benefit have gone missing, after being posted from HM Revenue and Customs to the audit office.

There's not really much point in excerpting the rest of the story. This is quite possibly the single biggest data protection failure in the world, ever. Nearly half of the entire population of the country is now at risk of fraud due to their personal details being simply 'missing'. There's almost no words for the scale of the mistake here. It is now clear that nobody, absolutely nobody, for any reason whatsoever, can continue to support the idea of ID cards and the accompanying database any longer, given the very clear risks demonstrated.

But if there's one thing - increasingly, it's starting to look like the only thing - that this government is really rather good at, it's ploughing full steam ahead with a disregard for facts, experience and common sense. This is the same government that thought that 1999 would be a really good time to sell off half of Britain's gold reserves, that tax credits so complicated that nobody can work out their entitlements would be a jolly good idea, that the credit bubble was entirely benign and could never go wrong. On the last point, the government persisted despite clear warnings from economists, amongst them current Lib Dem Acting Leader Vince Cable.

The same pattern is becoming apparent throughout government policy. On Iraq, military and intelligence doubts were brushed aside; economic advice was ignored prior to the Northern Rock collapse, and on ID cards, even criticism from the Information Commissioner has not been heeded.

As someone who works in an IT-related field, I feel that I know just how often IT systems can fail. And that's before you even consider the even greater possibility of human failure. The lesson that systems engineers have learned is that a bit of paranoia can be a healthy safeguard, and that to trust anything to a single system is utter boneheaded stupidity of a kind that would have any self-respecting systems administrator laughed out of the room by his peers. But, of course, the government has little concern for the opinions of people who might actually know what they're talking about, whether they're doctors, soldiers, economists, lawyers, teachers or just ordinary people. And so, the detachment from reality continues, until it becomes as obvious as it did with the Major government. And we all know what happens next...


Comments

On 20 November 2007 - 11:01pm, Rob Knight wrote:

Update: I'm watching my local MP, Jane Kennedy, attempt to defend the government's record on this travesty on Newsnight. (Swing required: 4.35%, apparently). She is attempting to argue with a systems security professor from Cambridge University. Rarely is the government so obliging in proving my arguments for me!


On 21 November 2007 - 12:11am, Peter Welch wrote:

The professor was very good!

Peter Welch


On 21 November 2007 - 12:58am, Robin Young (not verified) wrote:

No, Peter, I didn't think the Cambridge professor was so very good at all. When asked by Paxo about ID cards he rather dismissed it saying words to the effect: "ID cards have little security relevance. They are a political issue, not a security one".
But of course the political case cited by Labour for introducing ID cards was precisely a security one (defence against terrorism) - and the collection of personal information onto a hi-tech ID card would raise precisely all the security problems (only in much aggravated form) which the professor himself said had made the loss of child benefit claimants' records and similar misfortunes "an accident waiting to happen".
The poor minister (Jane Kennedy, did someone say? - never heard of her before tonight) put up to defend the indefensible seemed to think the Govt might still make a go of ID cards, in which case we should perhaps offer Icarus another crack at flying.


On 21 November 2007 - 12:58am, Robin Young (not verified) wrote:

No, Peter, I didn't think the Cambridge professor was so very good at all. When asked by Paxo about ID cards he rather dismissed it saying words to the effect: "ID cards have little security relevance. They are a political issue, not a security one".
But of course the political case cited by Labour for introducing ID cards was precisely a security one (defence against terrorism) - and the collection of personal information onto a hi-tech ID card would raise precisely all the security problems (only in much aggravated form) which the professor himself said had made the loss of child benefit claimants' records and similar misfortunes "an accident waiting to happen".
The poor minister (Jane Kennedy, did someone say? - never heard of her before tonight) put up to defend the indefensible seemed to think the Govt might still make a go of ID cards, in which case we should perhaps offer Icarus another crack at flying.


On 21 November 2007 - 7:42am, Rob Knight wrote:

Robin, I think he was simply making the point that the decision over ID cards is political, and as a non-politician he had no partisan point to make on the subject. In my opinion, that just made his following criticisms of government policy even more powerful, because he was making them without a political axe to grind. People expects the Lib Dems and the Conservatives to attack the Labour party, but the point is that there is serious resistance coming from people who aren't political at all, but just care about things being done properly.


On 22 November 2007 - 11:49am, Peter Welch wrote:

I was impressed by his take on the creation of government database - separating the banal cock-up from the risky strategy if you like.

More on Icarus here

http://www.ling.upenn.edu/~creswell/auden.html

somehow appropriate tot he casual lunacy of all this!

Peter Welch