<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.liberalreview.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>frivolity</title>
 <link>http://www.liberalreview.com/taxonomy/term/162</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>What&#039;s on my desktop?</title>
 <link>http://www.liberalreview.com/node/929</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;So, I&#039;ve been &lt;a href=&quot;http://fabulousblueporcupine.wordpress.com/2007/12/20/inside-the-peoples-republic/&quot;&gt;tagged&lt;/a&gt;, and therefore must now reveal the contents of my desktop to the world.  Upon realising this, my first thought was &quot;hang on, what &lt;em&gt;does&lt;/em&gt; my desktop look like?&quot;.  I normally have so many windows open that catching sight of the desktop itself is a rare occurrence; normally only when the computer first boots up.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Having reacquainted myself with its contents, I should now point out that asking people who work in IT to show the world what&#039;s on their desktops is a &lt;em&gt;very bad idea&lt;/em&gt;.  Why?  Because you get something like this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://robknight.org.uk/desktop.png&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/sites/default/files/u1/desktop-small.png&quot; width=&quot;500&quot; height=&quot;177&quot; alt=&quot;desktop-small.png&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(click the above image if you really must see the full-size version).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The explanation for the enormous desktop is that I have two monitors, one off to the left and one central.  So, my &#039;main&#039; desktop starts somewhere about 40% of the way in (1280 pixels in, to be precise).  It&#039;s thoroughly boring, functional and, well, it&#039;s &lt;em&gt;grey&lt;/em&gt;.  No wonder I can&#039;t remember what it looks like.  The contents basically consist of icons put there by applications obnoxious enough to not give me an option to avoid having the desktop icon, and a curious zip file entitled &#039;everything&#039;, which must have once been very important, to have merited being put on the desktop to gather dust rather than gathering dust somewhere less visible.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now, I must tag other people:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) My co-blogger Peter Welch&lt;br /&gt;
2) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.northumbrian.org.uk/rob/&quot;&gt;Rob Fenwick&lt;/a&gt;, who may outdo my geeky desktop&lt;br /&gt;
3) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.willhowells.org.uk/blog/&quot;&gt;Will Howells&lt;/a&gt;, ditto&lt;br /&gt;
4) &lt;a href=&quot;http://johnhemming.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;John Hemming&lt;/a&gt;, because we really need to know what MPs have on their desktops&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.liberalreview.com/node/929#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.liberalreview.com/taxonomy/term/162">frivolity</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 20:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Rob Knight</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">929 at http://www.liberalreview.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
