<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.liberalreview.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>manifesto</title>
 <link>http://www.liberalreview.com/issues/manifesto</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>What would you like in your manifesto?</title>
 <link>http://www.liberalreview.com/content/2006/10/what-would-you-like-in-your-manifesto</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A crack Lib dem manifesto team has been assembled to write the programme that will capture the imagination of the nation and lead us to the victory - well, probably.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to &lt;a&gt;Politics.co.uk&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Liberal Democrats have started preparing their manifesto in anticipation of a snap election this time next year. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Health spokesman Steve Webb will lead a team including leader Menzies Campbell, campaign chief Ed Davey, work and pensions spokesman David Laws and Treasury spokesman Vince Cable. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The party has already proposed an increase in green taxes and a 2p cut in the basic rate of income tax, and has stressed the need for more devolution in public services. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sir Menzies said the manifesto process would be &quot;started immediately, be fully costed and will consult with all sections of the party&quot;. Mr Webb said the Lib Dems would show other parties how to create a &quot;free, fair and green society in the 21st century&quot;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Today&#039;s announcement suggests the Lib Dems expect Tony Blair&#039;s successor, likely to be Gordon Brown, to call an election within months of taking over. The prime minister has said he will quit by next September.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It will be a tough job. The economics chapter of &lt;cite&gt;Britain after Blair&lt;/cite&gt; is competent and should give us more credibility than we have had in the past.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As for the rest of it, we have a lot of work to do. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Green Taxation is our most interesting policy area, and the focus of our attention at present. But there is certainly a danger that our Green Taxation proposals will be out of date before we get to an election. Labour&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-2413006,00.html&quot;&gt;road pricing proposals&lt;/a&gt; could steal some thunder on this. We must keep the principle, but the details will need to be reconsidered, and the approach is probably gong to be less distinctive.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Where do we stand on the other big issues? Steve Webb&#039;s line on the NHS has been that &quot;reforms are okay but should be slower&quot;. This may well be correct but is hardly a great rallying cry. I imagine that we will come up with a &quot;scrap PFI line&quot; on health. On balance I think this is a good thing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Om Education we seem to have swallowed Tomlinson whole. Our line on post-19 education is good. On Schools we don&#039;t have such a striking message. We float a lot of ideas on using resources better (but who believes politicians can achieve this?). And of course there is our fine stance on the fourth R. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My personal manfesto would probably be for more parental choice in cities, a focus on Maths and English, a revival in school sports, fewer targets, fewer tests, but tough exams and no assessed coursework unless absolutely necessay. Not very trendy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We should promote more housebuilding, a better mix of housing, and better energy efficiency (heating and transport) from the outset. Regional policy should be part of the policy mix, and I&#039;d like to see a role for a land tax in this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a big challenge on the constitution: STV, an English chamber as a temporary measure, and devolution to counties for many of the services devolved to Wales and Scotland might be the way forward. I&#039;m not much bothered on the Lords personally.&lt;br /&gt;
A Speaker&#039;s Conference on a British Bill of rights to entrench our rights to drive a 4x4 to Tesco&#039;s without an ID card might be worthwhile, but the ECHR should be non-negotiable.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On Foreign Affairs we are best placed (perhaps not surprisingly). On Iraq we are saying the right things. On Europe, we need a realistic line on the Euro (we will continue to monitor whether it is in the UK interest to join and hold a referendum if it is). On Europe we need to strike the sort of note provided by Michael Moore (and Nick Clegg) rather than Andrew Duff.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Speaking of Clegg, he has been doing a good job on Home Affairs, and the Repeal Act should certainly feature on the Billboards rather than the small print. A big idea on crime wouldn&#039;t come amiss. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What should we get rid of?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We have dumped the &quot;votes for murderers&quot; policy. We should do the same with our &quot;16 is old enough for everything&quot; approach.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That will do for now. I only switched on the computer to check the weather forecast...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.liberalreview.com/content/2006/10/what-would-you-like-in-your-manifesto#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.liberalreview.com/issues/manifesto">manifesto</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 22:09:01 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Peter Welch</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">621 at http://www.liberalreview.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
